Why Can’t IRAN Have the BOMB?

The Bush Presidents, as well as Clinton, Obama and Trump all echoed the chorus, “Iran cannot get a nuclear weapon.”
Israel has one…as well as Pakistan, North Korea, China, France, Russia, UK, India and the US. So why can’t Iran have one? Almost no one on establishment media or even most indy podcasts ever asks this question. Why not?

The only ethically coherent, morally correct answer is that no one and no country should have nuclear weapons. The threat that their existence imposes on everyone is a violation of the non-aggression principle and its interdiction against the threat of or initiation of force except in true self defense.
Well then what about other weapons of mass destruction like chemical and biological?
Yes, exactly. Those also should not be allowed on the surface of planet Earth or anywhere else in the cosmos.
Now the Trump administration is pressuring Iran’s supreme leader Ali Khamenei to negotiate a deal… or else. “If Iran doesn’t come to a good deal, they will be in great danger,” says Trump.
That’s not a negotiation. That’s extortion.
So what possible justification is there for such blatant bullying?
In the Fox News sit down with Bret Baier, Senator Katie Britt stated, with no evidence or justification, that, “We know that if they have the bomb they will use it.”
A reminder — no country in the world has ever used an atomic weapon… Except the US, on Japan, and they also used depleted uranium shells in Iraq.

In the same conversation, Senator Lindsey Graham pronounced that, “Iran is working on 6 nuclear bombs and if they get the bomb they will 1) destroy Israel 2) then they will come after us, and then they will 3) purify Islam.”
Senator John Kennedy chimed in, “If Iran gets a nuclear bomb there will be a war…and Israel will start it.”
All of these statements were made without any basis in fact or rationale.
The closest any of these war hawks come to an excuse, for decades, is their claim that “Iran is dedicated to wiping Israel and all Jews off the face of the Earth.” As far as I can tell, this goes back to distorted translations of former Iran leader, Mahmoud Ahmadinejad, who was misquoted in his UN speech and others, when what he was actually saying was, “They need a regime change in Israel, because they want to wipe us off the face of the Earth.”

So let’s see if we can actually put some pieces of the puzzle together so that it rings true, even if unfair, dangerous, or crazy.
In response to Trump’s letter requiring negotiation, Iran’s leader Ali Khamenei stated, “The insistence of some bullying governments on negotiations is not aimed at resolving issues but rather at asserting dominance and imposing their demands… Rather, for them, negotiations are a means to raise new demands, including restrictions on defense capabilities and international influence.”
It’s not commonly reported in the Western press that Trump is asking for more than a removal of all of their atomic infrastructure, which they are allowed to have according to the JCPOA agreement, and which permits Iran to maintain a limited enrichment program under strict monitoring in exchange for sanctions relief.
Also, under article IV of the Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT), all parties to the treaty have the “inalienable right … to develop research, production and use of nuclear energy for peaceful purposes without discrimination …”
Yes, that’s heading in the right direction, but bringing plutonium from deep in the Earth, where its job is to dismantle heavy elements, is like developing “gain of function” bio-weapons “for defensive purposes.” If they are there, most likely somebody’s going to use them — either accidentally, or offensively under false pretenses.
Trump is also demanding a complete dismantling of Iran’s defensive missile weapon systems, as well as forbidding any association between Iran and Hezbollah, Hamas, or the Houthis. In other words, Trump is insisting on not only curbing Iran’s nuclear program but also eliminating its regional influence and military capabilities.
Well, how does this make sense? Why would Trump do such a one-sided demand? Let’s look to recent history. In North Korea, Trump used war hawk and National Security Advisor John Bolton to add a poison pill provision to their denuclearization peace talks. At the last moment, Bolton insisted that North Korea also give up their ballistic missile capabilities. The talks fell apart. Kim Jong Un knew that he would be invaded if he could not protect himself with armed missiles.

Before that, Secretary of State Hillary Clinton tricked Muammar Gaddafi, the Libyan leader, into giving up his WMD programs — nuclear, chemical, and ballistic missiles — after which he was overthrown and savagely assassinated by NATO-led forces in 2011.

Is it now beginning to make sense? Remember after 9/11, when retired Gen. Wesley Clark was visiting the Pentagon, and was shown an already existing plan for the US to take down seven countries in the Middle East: Iraq, Libya, Lebanon, Somalia, Sudan…and Iran.

All of the rest have been attacked, decimated and a Rothschild central banking system has been installed, except for Iran. So clearly they are in the crosshairs, and Sen. John McCain is dancing from the grave and still singing, “Bomb Iran, bomb, bomb Iran.”
But why would Trump do this. We don’t need their oil. We don’t need their money. They’re certainly not an actual military threat to us (unless we attack them). So who is so desperate to disarm them by coercion or by actual force?
Once again, all roads for war in the Middle East lead back to Tel Aviv. Prime Minister Netanyahu’s plan for the “Greater Israel” includes not only Gaza, but dismantling and taking over Iran to neutralize all threats to their domination of the Middle East, and then the world.
The money, materials, and the sons and daughters of America have been the cannon fodder for the faux-Jewish, Sabbatean/Frankist Rothschild Zionist takeover plan that I call the Global Domination Agenda. The Rothschilds rule the international central bankers, as they have for centuries, and Israel was created as the command center for global financial and military domination — a one world government with the central bankers, and now the technocrats in charge.
How could such a small country manipulate the vast power of the United States like a puppet on strings? I believe the answer is a combination of the fact that they have been controlling the fake money system that has allowed them to print money when the rest of us can’t, and that has given them power over virtually all governments and corporations. Then they have enhanced that with Epstein style blackmail of corrupt leaders, including from the US.
Trump has shown that he is willing to put his life at risk for his agenda, so is it just past debts that the Israeli Zionists hold over him, or do they have “collateral”… blackmail-worthy evidence that would take away the power that he so treasures? I don’t know, and I believe we will find out soon.
A silver lining in all of this, is that the Rothschild agenda is being exposed through independent media, and even at universities all over the world. Its ruthlessness is being spotlighted for all to see in Gaza, in the US government, in the EU, and now in Iran. The COVERT-19 scam has been exposed, as has Wokeism, and the fake Climate scare. Now the pedo-blackmail and the fake money schemes are getting revealed. As freedom lovers awaken to this greatest conspiracy of all time, we can achieve the alignment to put an end to all wars, create honest money systems and ultimately dispel the “myth of authority” itself and rid ourselves of all governments and nation states.
While otherwise well-intended Zionists like Donald Trump, Marco Rubio, Pete Hegseth, Mike Waltz, RFK Jr., and Tulsi Gabbard are being played like rooks on a chessboard, other increasingly influential critical thinkers like Jeffrey Sachs, Tucker Carlson, Joe Rogan, Dave Smith, Scott Horton, Catherine Austin Fitts, Candace Owens, Mike Whitney, Nick Giambruno, Whitney Webb and Jeremy Hammond are sounding the clarion call for truth, ethics, and world peace before it’s too late.
